Re: Cyclists.
I always feel the bitter pill in cyclists and the hazard they cause is the total and complete lack of interest they create with the authorities.
I am so bored of hearing about cyclist fatalities and injuries on our roads...my argument is that if this is such a cause for concern, why not simply have a little enforcement of the highway code? If cyclists were required to carry endorseable driving licences, I sometimes think the accident rate would plummet because there would be an instant incentive for the police to pull over all the pavement riders, those with no lights (including those pathetic tiny invisible flashing lights), those who refuse to ride on cycle paths (use should be compulsory), riders in pedestrianised areas, red light runners, restricted turn busters....this list goes on.
The reality is, the police aren't interested because any conviction doesn't score highly enough on their stats. I can't count how many times I have seen a cyclist nearly hit by a car because of their own suicidal riding and I would find it very hard to have sympathy with anyone who (for example) just steamed through a red light and then gets flattened by a car (which would always be the car driver's fault!!).
When it comes to cyclists and the law, there is too much of a "I'll get away with it because I can" and "So what and who cares?" attitude, which then leads to "I'll do whatever I like".
I even remember once of driving past a mobile tripod mounted speed camera late at night. As I was passing, a cyclist passed the three coppers manning the trap, on the pavement, no lights and on the wrong side of the road. They just stepped out of his way and let him carry on. Obviously, a case of the police not interested in road safety and looking for the 'quick bust' of the motorist.
Incidentally, I was a cyclist for many years and never once broke a red light and made sure I was always road worthy.