King Charles III

It was odd not having the Queen laying the wreath at the Cenotaph yesterday, both looked exhausted.

Re: King Charles III

Philip looked very frail I thought. And the Queen looked tired and worried. I personally think it's time for her to step back, I'd like to see them both end their lives together having a bit of a rest. She's done her duty by now


I'm not a Charles and camila fan at all but if that's all we have then I just hope there is something left for William to take over eventually and that he doesn't lead us into a republic.


Apologies for calling the Queen the Queer that was my predictive text and I've put it right now.

Re: King Charles III

They did look Sad , and who knows what ails them at their age ,death is imminent.
Im not sure Charles will do such a good job , with what happened with Diana and Camilla, he certainly not be on the throne for long .

Re: King Charles III

They are old and it was a sad day .
Charles can lay a wreath with as much dignity as anyone else .
He will not be on the throne long because he too is old.
He's had a long time waiting to be king .

Re: King Charles III

It's true that Charlie-boy will not be King for long, and neither he nor The Dog will be popular, I'm sure of that.

I believe that William will be more liked and respected by the people, although nowhere near as much so as the Queen.

I think it would be a shame, and to our detriment as a nation, if we ever became a republic.

Re: King Charles III

Prince Philip joked last year, “Well, I can’t stand up much longer.” He was leaning against the wall but can't see anyone suggesting he use a mobility frame.

Re: King Charles III

I read somewhere earlier in the year that the queen decided to do the balcony because if she didn’t then Phillip would have taken his place beside her and he’s really just too frail

Re: King Charles III

lol wat?!

Isn't/Wasn't her duty to protect this country, to defend it from being sezied by foreign powers and to potect our justice system from the same? Didn't she swear a Coronation Oath to that effect?!

How is it then that this Germanic family have given Royal Assent to each of the EU Treaties which has passed the sovereignty, control, and justice system of this country over to the foreign power which is the EU?

No madam, she has very much not done her duty. She has failed the UK populous in the most severe and treasonous way possible. There is now no place in this country for the monarchy. That monarchy has become a joke and has betrayed the country and allowed politicians, by stealth and skulduggery, to sell this country to foreign interests, all of it fraudulent, all of it completely breaking the British Constitution.

It's time for HM The Queen and Co to be abolished or to be replaced by a new monarch who does love this country and who will ensure that it maintains its sovereignty.

Re: King Charles III

Worth also saying that it would have been utterly hypocritical for her to have laid wreaths. All those valient men and women died to maintain this country, to maintain its sovereignty, to preserve its values and to preserve the freedoms which we enjoy. HM has run roughshod over all those sacrifices by permitting the country to be handed over to the EU. It would have been a farce if she had laid wreaths imo.

Re: King Charles III

She's getting a lot of blame for our being in the EU, isn't she?

The fact is that she avoids interfering in political matters which, I believe, is the correct thing to do. If the Queen did make important decisions regarding political matters, that would bring into doubt the validity of our having a democratically elected parliament, wouldn't it?

The Queen's Speech she makes every year is, you must realise, only nominal. It is written by the PM and she is speaking only as a figurehead.

Some argue that, if the country should ever be in a dire situation she would have the right to over-ride the government's decisions, but I'm not sure at all that that is the case in reality.