mountain cannabis - should we leave them up high ?

mountain cannabis - helicopter tune to the rescue 25.09.17

saturday night is all about concussion
its only to well known in cumbria
going through the roof are sales of black russian
to the naive that's sinsemillia.
4 men who loved the trees
decided to make a natural point
mount scarfell was to bring them to there knees
it was a decision that was wrong by joint.
lucky wasdale were supersonic
a rescue team and no stunt
anxiety was stemming from the chronic
i am clearly blaming the blunt.
to climb is a responsibility
its not about luck or hope
you can not do it after a ton of broccoli
i bet you all feel a dope.
step in the superintendent
justin bibby was flowing like a fountain
preaching like the 10 crack commandment
let me quote "it has no place on the mountain.".
getting thin is the rope
no compassion is scary
the view is "leave them on the slope"
local residents are sick to death of aunt mary.
to the village i will funk
is this the place for the gangster
poetry is more profitable then skunk
stuck in highgate is this prankster.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/453522...pable-walking/ and if you need to call the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7UTLZqFiNE to check street name you could also try looking here http://luxury.rehabs.com/marijuana-r...and-nicknames/

Re: mountain cannabis - should we leave them up high ?

No I wouldn't leave them up there I would however insist they pay all costs of rescue. That might make people think twice.

Re: mountain cannabis - should we leave them up high ?

That could be extended to anyone that needs rescuing.....one risk too many?

Anyone with a disability that is thought to be a contributory factor.

The list is endless.

Maybe personal insurance cover?

Re: mountain cannabis - should we leave them up high ?

Yes, I agree but I'm not so sure how such a policy could successfully be extended to all those who recklessly contribute to their predicament.

The blame in this case seems clear but there will be others where blame, or the extent of it, might be arguable.

In the end, people's safety has to come first before any financial aspects so I'm not sure what the answer is. It's similar to the argument that could be had over whether the NHS should provide free A&E treatment for accidents resulting from foolish or reckless behaviour.