Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

PC gone mad? Or about time more decorum and decency was shown?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/b...rs-Riders.html


On the left we have the books original cover.. of 30 years ago.
On the right we have the new cover because it looks ... less rude?
Should the publishers have changed the cover?

Cast your votes.
Is everything getting too picky thesedays or is time to clean everything up?

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

The classic reason for not judging a book by its cover.

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

They can do what they want for me, i won't be reading it..

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

At first I thought it was the other way round, as it's a sexy book leave it as it is as it would catch your eye

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

Cast your vote?

I vote for image no.1, nicely shaped bottom, nice tanned hand, and a bit of naughtiness in the air!
Image no.2 is absolutely dreadful...horrible shapeless saggy bottom, no shading or curves, nervous looking hand....rubbish.

Is this a kind of New Prudery we're being subjected to?

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

I've read one of hers, not sure if this was it - anyway nothing wrong the original cover so I vote for that.
I think there's more to worry about these days than a hand on a nicely shaped bottom!

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

I'm amazed they changed the cover - today, anything goes
I'm heartened by it - for a few seconds ..............

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

Having a saggy bottom of No.2 myself , I vote for No1. Nice tight bum

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

Re: Uproar Over Raunchy Cover Change

Number 1 for me lovely sexy bum, and I agree the one on the right is too saggy, looks like she was too long in the saddle.