Re: Printer ink pricier than champagne finds Which?
Must be a quiet time at Which?.Re: Printer ink pricier than champagne finds Which?
Re: Printer ink pricier than champagne finds Which?
Re: Printer ink pricier than champagne finds Which?
Re: Printer ink pricier than champagne finds Which?
It is, of course, outrageous, but the manufacturers get away with it because they can. My last printer, an Epson XP750 I think it was, lasted for about five years and always printed well. I only ever used compatible inks. It eventually died because the waste ink pad was full and, tbh, it wasn't worth paying out to have it replaced. Throughout its life I made a point of never downloading the software updates for fear that there would be something in them somewhere that blocked me using compatible inks!Re: Printer ink pricier than champagne finds Which?
Re: Printer ink pricier than champagne finds Which?
My main printer for letters etc. is a laser printer - the toner cartridges last for ages. My other printer that I use for printing photos is a Kodak. They no longer produce printers because that branch of the company was taken over. There's also no support for consumables such as print cartridges - for that reason, I've been forced to use so-called compatibles and thus far, have had no problems with them. It helps when the companies producing them have a good reputation for the product they sell and a good returns policy if they don't meet someone's expectations.
|