Re: Time Machine
Been asked this question many times and after thinking on it for a time decided it would have to be forward in time. Although there are lots of things I could change in the past I would be scared of the ripple effect and that I may lose what I already have. So yes it has to be a future movement leaving the past has it is.Re: Time Machine
As long as time travel wouldn't affect me and I couldn't actually interfere or be seen, then the future would be interesting to peep into - maybe 100 years from now. There are also several happenings in the past that would be fascinating to see first hand, and to see how history has skewed the actual events over time.Re: Time Machine
I have to say I did love the 60's and count myself lucky to have been there and the right age to enjoy it too. But my real love is the thirties and although I wasn't even born then I feel a strange affiliation with that era, something I can never explain, the style of the clothes, the art decor, the live like there was no tomorrow attitude of the young, and indeed when the war came there was no tomorrow for many of the poor souls. Another good thing about the 30's, there was not a bit of plastic to be seen anywhere, real wood and shiny chrome was all the rage, yes those were the times I would like to be transported back to.Re: Time Machine
Re: Time Machine
I would head straight back to Medieval England - an era I'm fascinated by. I wouldn't try to change anything though (I've watched the film The Butterfly Effect and have seen it actually happen) but I would love to see how well it sits alongside history's version of life at that time.
|